Why the European Super League is not good for fans and domestic football
i

European Super League and it's issues || Credit: Imago

Why the European Super League is not good for fans and domestic football

Stephen Oladehinde 13:04 - 22.12.2023

The concept of a European Super League has been a topic of intense debate within the football community. To understand why such a league might not be beneficial for fans and domestic football, it's important to dissect the underlying issues and implications.

Introduction to the European Super League Concept

The European Super League proposes a continental league featuring some of Europe's elite clubs. On the surface, it appears to offer a new height of competition and financial gain. 

However, the foundations of this concept are riddled with potential pitfalls for fans and the traditional domestic football structure.

Impact on Fans

Loss of Traditional Rivalries: The charm of football lies in its local and regional rivalries, steeped in history. A European Super League could dilute these rivalries, distancing fans from the teams they've supported for generations.

Increased Commercialization: The Super League is seen as a move towards further commercialization, potentially leading to increased ticket prices and subscription fees, making it less accessible for average fans.

Eroding Club Identity and Culture: Clubs participating in a Super League risk losing their unique identity and culture, which are often closely tied to their local communities and fan bases.

Football fans || Imago
Football fans || Imago

The Detriment to Fan Culture

A fundamental aspect of football is its deep-rooted fan culture, which thrives on local and national rivalries. The creation of a Super League risks diluting these traditional rivalries, as the focus shifts to more commercially lucrative international fixtures. This shift could alienate the grassroots supporters who form the backbone of club identities.

Threat to Domestic Leagues

The ESL poses a significant threat to the competitive balance and financial stability of domestic leagues. Concentrating wealth and talent in a select few clubs could lead to a decrease in the quality and competitiveness of national leagues, which are already struggling to keep pace with the financial might of the top clubs.

Sporting Merit Takes a Backseat

The proposed format of the ESL, which initially included permanent members, undermines the principle of sporting merit. Football's appeal lies in its unpredictability and the possibility for underdogs to triumph. A closed league format runs counter to these principles, potentially making football more predictable and less exciting.

Financial Implications for Smaller Clubs

Smaller clubs rely heavily on revenue sharing from domestic leagues and UEFA competitions. The ESL could disrupt this ecosystem, depriving these clubs of crucial funds necessary for their survival and development. This financial disparity could widen the gap between the elite and the rest, impacting the overall health of the sport.

Comparing European Super League and UEFA Champions League

Format and Inclusivity:

The UEFA Champions League operates on a merit-based system where teams qualify through their performance in domestic leagues. This ensures a level of competitiveness and fairness.

In contrast, the European Super League is perceived to favour a closed or semi-closed format, where certain elite clubs are guaranteed participation regardless of their domestic performance. This undermines the meritocratic principles that are fundamental to sports.

European Super League and UEFA Champions League || Free Vector Art & Graphics
European Super League and UEFA Champions League || Free Vector Art & Graphics

Financial Implications:

The Champions League, while lucrative, distributes wealth in a way that benefits a wider range of clubs across Europe. It provides substantial revenue not only to participating clubs but also to those in lower tiers through solidarity payments.

The Super League, with its focus on a smaller group of elite clubs, risks concentrating wealth among these clubs, potentially exacerbating financial disparities within European football.

Fan Engagement and Experience:

The Champions League has a rich history and tradition that resonates with fans globally. Its anthem, iconic nights, and the prestige of winning it hold a special place in the hearts of football enthusiasts.

The European Super League could struggle to replicate this emotional connection, particularly if it is seen as a breakaway entity driven by financial motives rather than sporting excellence.

Impact on Domestic Leagues:

Participation in the Champions League currently complements domestic league commitments. Teams strive to perform well domestically to qualify for this prestigious European competition.

The Super League could potentially overshadow domestic competitions, leading to a lack of interest and investment in domestic leagues, which are crucial for the development of local talent and maintaining a broad fan base.

Global Appeal and Accessibility:

The Champions League is accessible to a wide audience globally, with matches played across different days and times, allowing fans from various time zones to engage.

The European Super League's structure might not be as accommodating, potentially limiting its appeal and accessibility to a global audience.

Clubs' Reactions Against the Super League

Manchester United and Liverpool (English Premier League): Initially part of the Super League plans, both clubs faced immense backlash from their fans. 

The protests were particularly intense at Manchester United, leading to the club's withdrawal from the Super League proposal. Liverpool also withdrew following fan protests, emphasizing the importance of traditional football values.

FC Barcelona and Real Madrid (La Liga): As two of the main proponents of the Super League, these clubs faced criticism for prioritizing financial gains over the sporting merit of domestic and European competitions. Despite widespread opposition, they remained steadfast in their support for the Super League concept.

AC Milan and Juventus (Serie A): Initially in favour of the Super League, AC Milan later acknowledged the fans' voice and withdrew, citing the need for a sustainable model that considers the entire football ecosystem. Juventus, while open to future dialogue, also faced criticism and uncertainty within its fanbase and the broader football community.

Bayern Munich and Borussia Dortmund (Bundesliga): 

Both clubs took a strong stance against the Super League. They emphasized their commitment to the existing European competition structure and the importance of maintaining the integrity of domestic leagues.

Paris Saint-Germain (Ligue 1): PSG stood out by not joining the Super League, citing their commitment to the principles of solidarity and responsible governance in football. Their decision was widely praised as a stand for the existing football structure and the interests of the wider football community.

Conclusion with Clubs' Perspectives

The varied reactions from these clubs highlight the complex dynamics at play. While some viewed the Super League as a financially lucrative opportunity, others prioritized the traditional structures of football and the interests of fans. 

The widespread backlash from fans and certain clubs underscores the deep-rooted connection between football clubs and their local communities, emphasizing that any future reformations in European football should be approached with careful consideration of these relationships and the overall health of the sport.

Tags: